Stem Cells Research Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Stem Cells Research - Essay ExampleIn the attempt to bring some semblance of civility from both(prenominal) opposing camps, many articles have been written both for general readership and for the scientific community. The discourses have been tackled from different angles of argument yet it is still difficult to find pose ground.There are significant differences between a scholarly and popular return. Academic publication aims to provide the scientific community and academe theoretically establish arguments that would capture their attention. Popular publications on the other hand aim to educate the general public on the contentious bring outs without venturing into technical terminologies that may cloud the issue further. Writers for popular publications should consider the limitations of readers when it comes to explaining relevant facts. The academic and scientific community would not accept undecomposable explanations for the issues. They would consider the validity of the a rguments if they were well grounded and anchored on accepted theories. some(prenominal) mediums aim to inform but they carry different weights. In examining some examples of the two types of publications, it is but appropriate to consider the audience each of the publications was intended for. Ultimately, the tendency of the writers is to educate the public.At first glance, without delving into details, academic pub... If adept would require fast facts, then it is more practical to turn to popular publications. The strategy of this paper is to twin up two articles from each type with similar issues discussed. This would give the readers two presentations for the same issue. The Regulation ArgumentPopular Publication Article Title To create, or not to createAuthor Bernadine Healy, M.D.Publication U.S. News & World Report. WashingtonAcademic Publication Article Navigating the quagmire the regulation of humanity embryonic root cell lookAuthor/s D.G.Jones and C.R.TownsPublication Human ReproductionDr. Healy, writing on the necessity of having ground rules set before pursuing floor cell research further, attempted to influence her readers through her more emotional contentions about the issue. There was no attempt to elaborate on details. The writer dealt with simple facts that the public can easily relate and understand. She did give a brief background on the progress of legislation but very little detail. Healy presented one position on banning the continuance of stem cell research. She wrote, A Swiss law that took effect earlier this month is typical of laws in just about European countries It bans embryo creation outright.1Jones and Towns elaborated on four different positions. Position A advocated complete ban of stem cell research Position B called for status quo Position C allowed continued research within the 14-day limit for embryo extraction and Position D permitted the creation of human embryo for research purposes in addition to the other curre nt research initiatives.2Comparing the intentions of the two articles, both are informative but the writers of the scholarly publication allowed the readers to form their opinions after having